Impact assessment of a department-wide science education initiative using students’ perceptions of teaching and learning experiences

TitleImpact assessment of a department-wide science education initiative using students’ perceptions of teaching and learning experiences
Publication TypeJournal Article
Year of Publication2016
AuthorsJones F
JournalAssessment & Evaluation in Higher Education
Pagination1–16
ISSN0260-2938
Abstract

Evaluating major post-secondary education improvement projects involves multiple perspectives, including students’ perceptions of their experiences. In the final year of a seven-year department-wide science education initiative, we asked students in 48 courses to rate the extent to which each of 39 teaching or learning strategies helped them learn in the course. Results were related to the type of improvement model used to enhance courses, class size and course year level. Overall, students perceived unimproved courses as least helpful. Small courses that were improved with support from science education specialists were perceived overall as more helpful than similar courses improved by expert teaching-focused faculty without support, while the opposite was found for medium courses. Overall perceptions about large courses were similar to perceptions of medium courses. Perceived helpfulness of individual strategies was more nuanced and context dependent, and there was no consistent preference for either traditional or newer evidence-based instructional practices. Feedback and homework strategies were most helpful in smaller courses and independently improved courses. Results indicate that students are perceptive to benefits that arise when improvements are made either by expert educators or by research-focused faculty who received dedicated support from science education specialists.

URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2016.1188057
DOI10.1080/02602938.2016.1188057